<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0">
  <channel>
  <title>Atheism vs Christianity Google Group</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.lt/group/atheism-vs-christianity</link>
  <description>Welcome to Atheism vs Christianity. A site for continuous, lively and engaging debate between atheists and theists. All religions are invited to take on the challenges offered by atheists to your beliefs. </description>
  <language>en</language>
  <item>
  <title>Re: Religious beliefs of an atheist</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.lt/group/atheism-vs-christianity/browse_thread/thread/39eeb978ed37a4ee/645008ed5f163683?show_docid=645008ed5f163683</link>
  <description>
  The officious text is with a upper-case &amp;quot;G,&amp;quot; and theist are fully &lt;br&gt; aware of the fact that many non-believer do not use an upper-case G &lt;br&gt; when writing &amp;quot;god.&amp;quot; Many are so aware of this fact that they &lt;br&gt; continually complain about this lack of respect, or use this as a &lt;br&gt; &amp;quot;proof&amp;quot; that non-believers are actually in denial.
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.lt/group/atheism-vs-christianity/browse_thread/thread/39eeb978ed37a4ee/645008ed5f163683?show_docid=645008ed5f163683</guid>
  <author>
  ipu.belie...@gmail.com
  (Answer_42)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Thu, 18 Kov 2010 15:20:36 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: UK MINISTERS FRIGHTENED TO SPEAK OUT!!!</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.lt/group/atheism-vs-christianity/browse_thread/thread/a37c572c9a9a755a/38b706b70dac45ef?show_docid=38b706b70dac45ef</link>
  <description>
  A42: &amp;quot;And the people who came up with the actual form of &lt;br&gt; multiculturalism &lt;br&gt; thought just like you. And look were we are, they have failed, even &lt;br&gt; though they tried to correct their approach by implementing many new &lt;br&gt; measures that did not help because ultimately the concept itself is &lt;br&gt; flawed. &amp;quot; &lt;br&gt; So one concept failed in the past. Therefore all concepts vaguely
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.lt/group/atheism-vs-christianity/browse_thread/thread/a37c572c9a9a755a/38b706b70dac45ef?show_docid=38b706b70dac45ef</guid>
  <author>
  mezna...@gmail.com
  (Sebastian)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Thu, 18 Kov 2010 15:13:07 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: Celtic Womem</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.lt/group/atheism-vs-christianity/browse_thread/thread/ccfd8090463311c6/83245ff6d683bdfa?show_docid=83245ff6d683bdfa</link>
  <description>
  where in that c&#39;n&#39;p job does it mention catholic?
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.lt/group/atheism-vs-christianity/browse_thread/thread/ccfd8090463311c6/83245ff6d683bdfa?show_docid=83245ff6d683bdfa</guid>
  <author>
  dead.kenn...@live.co.uk
  (Dead Kennedy)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Thu, 18 Kov 2010 15:10:24 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: [AvC] Re: Religious beliefs of an atheist</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.lt/group/atheism-vs-christianity/browse_thread/thread/39eeb978ed37a4ee/e64106fe352e9d49?show_docid=e64106fe352e9d49</link>
  <description>
  Couldn&#39;t resist one though :-) &lt;br&gt; &amp;quot;Equivalent to religion&amp;quot; isn&#39;t the same as &amp;quot;is a religion&amp;quot;. &lt;br&gt; And I will admit that I found the American Atheists definition of atheist &lt;br&gt; that was presented to the court odd. &lt;br&gt; Although there&#39;s probably some background there too that I don&#39;t know. &lt;br&gt; However, what is clear is that the court decisions have not defined atheism
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.lt/group/atheism-vs-christianity/browse_thread/thread/39eeb978ed37a4ee/e64106fe352e9d49?show_docid=e64106fe352e9d49</guid>
  <author>
  trancegemi...@gmail.com
  (Trance Gemini)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Thu, 18 Kov 2010 15:09:57 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: Religious beliefs of an atheist</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.lt/group/atheism-vs-christianity/browse_thread/thread/39eeb978ed37a4ee/76e9b7a0951ea924?show_docid=76e9b7a0951ea924</link>
  <description>
  Source? &lt;br&gt; So you decided to ignore my whole post, but replied anyway? &lt;br&gt; Why is that? &lt;br&gt; Again: &lt;br&gt; You claim that the very fact that god included restrictions and &lt;br&gt; instructions regarding slaves means that god did not condone slavery. &lt;br&gt; However, god also included restrictions and instructions regarding &lt;br&gt; married people, so, using your &amp;quot;logic,&amp;quot; it means that god did not
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.lt/group/atheism-vs-christianity/browse_thread/thread/39eeb978ed37a4ee/76e9b7a0951ea924?show_docid=76e9b7a0951ea924</guid>
  <author>
  ipu.belie...@gmail.com
  (Answer_42)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Thu, 18 Kov 2010 15:09:26 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: Religious beliefs of an atheist</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.lt/group/atheism-vs-christianity/browse_thread/thread/39eeb978ed37a4ee/87f646aba7d18c41?show_docid=87f646aba7d18c41</link>
  <description>
  So, if man established slavery against god&#39;s will, it means that god &lt;br&gt; had explicitly condemn slavery. &lt;br&gt; Any sources? &lt;br&gt; So, it seems that you do not understand what &amp;quot;tacit agreement&amp;quot; means. &lt;br&gt; ______________________________ __________ &lt;br&gt; The radical defect in Christianity is that it tried to win the world &lt;br&gt; by a bribe, and it has become a nullity.
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.lt/group/atheism-vs-christianity/browse_thread/thread/39eeb978ed37a4ee/87f646aba7d18c41?show_docid=87f646aba7d18c41</guid>
  <author>
  ipu.belie...@gmail.com
  (Answer_42)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Thu, 18 Kov 2010 15:02:10 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: [AvC] Re: quick on-topic joke for Paddy&#39;s day..</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.lt/group/atheism-vs-christianity/browse_thread/thread/7a3bad7681b6a895/18c9615997c1e88e?show_docid=18c9615997c1e88e</link>
  <description>
  All in the eyes of the beholder. And not to be offended in much. dj
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.lt/group/atheism-vs-christianity/browse_thread/thread/7a3bad7681b6a895/18c9615997c1e88e?show_docid=18c9615997c1e88e</guid>
  <author>
  dbrisc...@gmail.com
  (Doris Briscoe)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Thu, 18 Kov 2010 14:56:56 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: Religious beliefs of an atheist</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.lt/group/atheism-vs-christianity/browse_thread/thread/39eeb978ed37a4ee/d09cac8ba50486c9?show_docid=d09cac8ba50486c9</link>
  <description>
  Good to hear. &lt;br&gt; You asked us to explain what a certain phrase could possibly mean in &lt;br&gt; light of the fact that it was uttered by an atheist. I provide a &lt;br&gt; sensible explanation, and you claim I am trying to &amp;quot;justify&amp;quot; it? &lt;br&gt; I don&#39;t get it. &lt;br&gt; And why the sarcasm? &lt;br&gt; ______________________________ __________ &lt;br&gt; The radical defect in Christianity is that it tried to win the world
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.lt/group/atheism-vs-christianity/browse_thread/thread/39eeb978ed37a4ee/d09cac8ba50486c9?show_docid=d09cac8ba50486c9</guid>
  <author>
  ipu.belie...@gmail.com
  (Answer_42)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Thu, 18 Kov 2010 14:55:32 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: What does a non-literal interpretation of genesis actually mean?</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.lt/group/atheism-vs-christianity/browse_thread/thread/8b46e1b251289a55/e24a5741a8fff691?show_docid=e24a5741a8fff691</link>
  <description>
  It&#39;s not so much what it means but what it doesn&#39;t mean. That is, it &lt;br&gt; doesn&#39;t mean whatever the mean ol&#39; atheist says it means when they &lt;br&gt; point out a contradiction or absurdity because the Bible absolutely, &lt;br&gt; positively, completely, indisputably must be right from all &lt;br&gt; perspectives, at all times, in all places. Ergo, rather than
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.lt/group/atheism-vs-christianity/browse_thread/thread/8b46e1b251289a55/e24a5741a8fff691?show_docid=e24a5741a8fff691</guid>
  <author>
  drafter...@gmail.com
  (Drafterman)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Thu, 18 Kov 2010 14:55:03 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: The Pope and boys sucking the penises of Priests - Christopher Hitchens</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.lt/group/atheism-vs-christianity/browse_thread/thread/be245aed705b3f8c/36adb66b8025c1b0?show_docid=36adb66b8025c1b0</link>
  <description>
  Except you do the same thing with atheists. So what makes you special?
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.lt/group/atheism-vs-christianity/browse_thread/thread/be245aed705b3f8c/36adb66b8025c1b0?show_docid=36adb66b8025c1b0</guid>
  <author>
  drafter...@gmail.com
  (Drafterman)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Thu, 18 Kov 2010 14:51:47 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: UK MINISTERS FRIGHTENED TO SPEAK OUT!!!</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.lt/group/atheism-vs-christianity/browse_thread/thread/a37c572c9a9a755a/4ca163ac9274ce11?show_docid=4ca163ac9274ce11</link>
  <description>
  A42: &amp;quot;How can you &amp;quot;better implement&amp;quot; a system that makes one half of &lt;br&gt; the &lt;br&gt; people inferior and subservient to the other half? &amp;quot; &lt;br&gt; By checking that no laws are broken. Assign a court official to &lt;br&gt; witness the arbitration processes maybe ... &lt;br&gt; A42: &amp;quot;A parallel legal sytem based on archaic religious laws will &lt;br&gt; always be
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.lt/group/atheism-vs-christianity/browse_thread/thread/a37c572c9a9a755a/4ca163ac9274ce11?show_docid=4ca163ac9274ce11</guid>
  <author>
  mezna...@gmail.com
  (Sebastian)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Thu, 18 Kov 2010 14:51:28 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: [AvC] Re: The Long Trip</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.lt/group/atheism-vs-christianity/browse_thread/thread/7209231e5395caa1/d294c37e7a0c4163?show_docid=d294c37e7a0c4163</link>
  <description>
  Ah, subjective dismissal and $1.50 was used to buy a soft drink. &lt;br&gt; Personal aesthetic noted. &lt;br&gt; I consider perhaps you confuse the indictment with the conviction. :) &lt;br&gt; Regards, &lt;br&gt; Brock
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.lt/group/atheism-vs-christianity/browse_thread/thread/7209231e5395caa1/d294c37e7a0c4163?show_docid=d294c37e7a0c4163</guid>
  <author>
  brockor...@gmail.com
  (Brock Organ)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Thu, 18 Kov 2010 14:47:24 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: [AvC] Re: Insane Christian child raising advice</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.lt/group/atheism-vs-christianity/browse_thread/thread/e9c357713b747e8b/497771dfceee07ce?show_docid=497771dfceee07ce</link>
  <description>
  To be clear, this was the specific article referenced: &lt;br&gt; &lt;a target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=nofollow href=&quot;http://www.nogreaterjoy.org/articles/general-view/archive/2009/october/08/unbinding-foolishness/&quot;&gt;[link]&lt;/a&gt; &lt;br&gt; Regards, &lt;br&gt; Brock
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.lt/group/atheism-vs-christianity/browse_thread/thread/e9c357713b747e8b/497771dfceee07ce?show_docid=497771dfceee07ce</guid>
  <author>
  brockor...@gmail.com
  (Brock Organ)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Thu, 18 Kov 2010 14:41:40 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: [AvC] Re: God is love?</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.lt/group/atheism-vs-christianity/browse_thread/thread/45e656221bf72486/4fab09f7207e7df8?show_docid=4fab09f7207e7df8</link>
  <description>
  Here is my thoughts for the morning. Education is good and a gift to be &lt;br&gt; able to have the chance to gain education to be put to good use. &lt;br&gt; But another thing was on my mind was this also. Say we have two lights,side &lt;br&gt; by side. One light is not shinning as bright as the other one. One starts &lt;br&gt; getting brighter and brighter and the other is getting duller and duller, so
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.lt/group/atheism-vs-christianity/browse_thread/thread/45e656221bf72486/4fab09f7207e7df8?show_docid=4fab09f7207e7df8</guid>
  <author>
  dbrisc...@gmail.com
  (Doris Briscoe)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Thu, 18 Kov 2010 14:37:23 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: [AvC] Re: Insane Christian child raising advice</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.lt/group/atheism-vs-christianity/browse_thread/thread/e9c357713b747e8b/72198702a9716527?show_docid=72198702a9716527</link>
  <description>
  Which line do you think I crossed? &lt;br&gt; Or perhaps the vitriol is not well considered. &lt;br&gt; Or you are just causing discord, Eris. &lt;br&gt; I only read the one you cited. Which did not support your claim. &lt;br&gt; Or not. :) &lt;br&gt; Regards, &lt;br&gt; Brock
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.lt/group/atheism-vs-christianity/browse_thread/thread/e9c357713b747e8b/72198702a9716527?show_docid=72198702a9716527</guid>
  <author>
  brockor...@gmail.com
  (Brock Organ)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Thu, 18 Kov 2010 14:36:23 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
